Epigenome-wide association study of long-term psychosocial stress in older adults.

Long-term psychosocial stress is strongly associated with negative physical and mental health outcomes, as well as adverse health behaviours; however, little is known about the role that stress plays on the epigenome. One proposed mechanism by which stress affects DNA methylation is through health behaviours. We conducted an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) of cumulative psychosocial stress (n = 2,689) from the Health and Retirement Study (mean age = 70.4 years), assessing DNA methylation (Illumina Infinium HumanMethylationEPIC Beadchip) at 789,656 CpG sites. For identified CpG sites, we conducted a formal mediation analysis to examine whether smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, and body mass index (BMI) mediate the relationship between stress and DNA methylation. Nine CpG sites were associated with psychosocial stress (all p < 9E-07; FDR q < 0.10). Additionally, health behaviours and/or BMI mediated 9.4% to 21.8% of the relationship between stress and methylation at eight of the nine CpGs. Several of the identified CpGs were in or near genes associated with cardiometabolic traits, psychosocial disorders, inflammation, and smoking. These findings support our hypothesis that psychosocial stress is associated with DNA methylation across the epigenome. Furthermore, specific health behaviours mediate only a modest percentage of this relationship, providing evidence that other mechanisms may link stress and DNA methylation.

Disparities in Patient Portal Use Among Adults With Chronic Conditions.

Importance: Disparities in patient access and use of health care portals have been documented. Limited research has evaluated disparities in portal use during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To assess prevalence of health care portal use before, during, and after the most restrictive phase of the pandemic (2019-2022) among the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions (C3) cohort and to investigate any disparities in use by sociodemographic factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study uses data from the C3 study, an ongoing, longitudinal, telephone-based survey of participants with multiple chronic conditions. Participants were middle aged and older-adult primary care patients who had an active portal account, recruited from a single academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois, between 2019 and 2022. Data were analyzed between March and June 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes of portal use (ie, number of days of portal login by year) were recorded for all study participants by the electronic data warehouse. All parent studies had uniform sociodemographic data and measures of social support, self-efficacy, health literacy, and health activation. Results: Of 536 participants (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [12.0] years; 336 [62.7%] female), 44 (8.2%) were Hispanic or Latinx, 142 (26.5%) were non-Hispanic Black, 322 (60.1%) were non-Hispanic White, and 20 individuals (3.7%) identified as other race, including Asian, Native American or Alaskan Native, and self-reported other race. In multivariable analyses, portal login activity was higher during the 3 years of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the 2019 baseline. Higher portal login activity was associated with adequate health literacy (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.51; 95% CI, 1.18-1.94) and multimorbidity (IRR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.17-1.64). Lower portal activity was associated with older age (≥70 years: IRR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.85) and female sex (IRR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.91). Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, lower portal activity was observed among Hispanic or Latinx patients (IRR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89), non-Hispanic Black patients (IRR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.83), and patients who identified as other race (IRR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.64). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study using data from the C3 study identified changes in portal use over time and highlighted populations that had lower access to health information. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in portal use. Sociodemographic disparities by sex and age were reduced, although disparities by health literacy widened. A brief validated health literacy measure may serve as a useful digital literacy screening tool to identify patients who need further support.

Longitudinal Associations Between Multimorbidities and Patient-Reported Quality of Life.

OBJECTIVES: The global prevalence of multimorbidity is increasing as the population ages. As individuals get older, they are likely to develop multiple chronic conditions, and nearly two-thirds of older adults in the United States are estimated to experience 2 or more chronic conditions. The present preregistered study examined whether multimorbidity was associated with longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (i.e., anxiety, depression, and physical function) and whether these associations were moderated by sociodemographic factors (i.e., sex, race, marital status, income, insurance, and education). METHODS: Data come from the Health Literacy and Cognitive Function Among Older Adults Longitudinal Study (LitCog), a prospective cohort study of English-speaking older adults (N = 900). At each measurement occasion, participants reported anxiety, depression, and physical function using the Patient Reported Outcomes Information System, chronic conditions, and sociodemographic characteristics. We employed multilevel growth models to estimate changes in health-related quality of life, with multimorbidities as a predictor and sociodemographics as covariates. RESULTS: Results indicated that individuals with multiple chronic conditions reported persistently high levels of anxiety and depression, and worse physical function. We found evidence for racial health disparities, such that individuals who identified as non-White experienced worse health-related quality of life as multimorbidities increased, relative to White participants. DISCUSSION: These results contribute to the current conversation about the long-term impacts of structural and systemic barriers experienced by minoritized groups. We further discuss the public health implications of multimorbidity in older adulthood.

LitCog Caregiver Cohort: a prospective, observational cohort study investigating US caregivers' health literacy, self-care skills and cognitive function.

INTRODUCTION: Many older adults receive assistance in managing chronic conditions. Yet complicating the utility of caregiver support is whether caregivers have sufficient skills to aid in a patient's self-care. Health literacy and cognition are important determinants of older adults' health outcomes, but few studies have examined caregiver health literacy, cognition and self-care skills and their relations to patient outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will expand an ongoing cognitive ageing cohort study (LitCog) to enroll a parallel caregiver cohort. Caregivers are eligible if they are (1) ≥18 years of age, (2) provided care for ≥6 months and (3) assisted with at least one activity of daily living, instrumental activity of daily living or health management task. Caregivers will complete interviews at time points corresponding with the LitCog participant interviews. Caregivers will complete assessments of health literacy, self-care skills, cognitive function, caregiver healthcare task difficulty, caregiver burden, caregiver self-efficacy, activation, technology use, busyness and routine and relationship quality. Caregivers will self-report the nature and intensity of care provided, and their own health status. Associations between caregiver presence and caregiver capacity with patient outcomes will be examined in a series of regression models, and mediating and moderating factors will be tested. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Review Board at Northwestern University has approved the study protocol (STU00026255). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and summaries will be provided to the funders of the study as well as patients and caregivers.

Medication Dosing Schedules, Medication Knowledge, and Dosing Errors of Adults Taking Complex Drug Regimens.

This study examined how patients take complex medication regimens at home. Participants were primary care patients, 21 years or older, and prescribed three or more medications. Interviews assessed medication dosing schedules, medication knowledge, and dosing errors. Participants (N=441) were middle aged (mean 56.9); the majority were Hispanic/Latino (73.4%), had limited English proficiency (59.0%), and had limited health literacy (89.0%). One in five participants dosed medication five or more times per day, although no participants in the sample had a label instructing them to take medication more than times times daily. On average, participants correctly identified the purpose of 65% of their medications. Half of participants made one or more dosing errors. Less than high school education and a regimen size of six or more medications were independently associated with less medication knowledge, whereas language discordant label instructions were associated with dosing errors. Screening for regimen dosing complication and interventions to simplify dosing schedules are needed.

Impact of COVID-19 on the capacity to self-manage health and chronic conditions.

Objective: To investigate well-being, lifestyle behaviors, self-management capacity and healthcare utilization among adults with chronic conditions at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Data was collected from two interviewer-administered telephone surveys conducted between March 27 - May 22, 2020. Participants were patients at Chicago-area clinics. Self-report and validated measures were used for study-related outcomes. Results: A total of 553 participants (age range 23-88) completed data collection at both timepoints. One in five (20.7%) participants experienced stress due to the coronavirus most or all the time and rates of negative well-being were high (WHO-5 Index mean = 58.7%). Almost a quarter (22.3%) engaged in hazardous drinking and 79.7% reported insufficient physical activity. Nearly one in four participants (23.7%) avoided seeking medical care due to worry about COVID-19. In multivariable analyses, greater COVID-19 related stress was associated with less physical activity, lower self-efficacy, greater difficulty managing health and medications, and delays in seeking medical care due to the coronavirus. Conclusions: Mental well-being, lifestyle behaviors, self-management capacity, and healthcare utilization were impacted in the months following the COVID outbreak. Innovation: These findings suggest health systems should implement proactive measures for detecting and treating emotional and behavioral COVID-related concerns.

Early COVID-19 Attitudes and Behaviors and Their Associations With Later Infection: A Local Perspective From One U.S. City.

BACKGROUND: At the onset of the pandemic, there was poor public awareness and inaction in response to COVID-19; it is less known whether this translated to subsequent infections. OBJECTIVES: To explore whether adults who perceived COVID-19 as less of a threat and who were not taking early actions were more likely to become infected over the following year. RESEARCH DESIGN: Survey data from the ongoing (COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions (C3) anonymized for review) cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred forty-two adults with a mean age of 63 and ≥1 chronic condition. MEASURES: Self-reported attitudes and behaviors regarding COVID-19 were assessed from March 13 to April 3, 2020, and COVID-19 infection status was captured between May 2020 and January 2021. Bivariate and multivariable analyses examined associations between early perceptions and behaviors with later infection. RESULTS: Approximately 7% reported infection with COVID-19 (N = 46). Adults who perceived the threat of COVID-19 less seriously at the initial outbreak were more likely to test positive over the following year [odds ratio (OR): 0.81, CI: 0.70-0.94; P = 0.006]. Those who were less likely to believe their actions would affect whether they would become infected were more likely to test positive (OR: 0.87, CI: 0.77-0.99; P = 0.03), as were adults who reported not changing their routines (OR: 0.45; CI: 0.24-0.85; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with delayed responses in acknowledging the threat of COVID-19 and in changing behaviors were more likely to contract the virus. This investigation provides insight into the consequences of inadequate public understanding and response to COVID-19, and it highlights the importance of promoting early awareness among high-risk groups during public health crises.

Associations Between Cognitive Impairment Severity and Barriers to Healthcare Engagement Among Older Adults.

Objectives: To assess whether older adults with a cognitive impairment were more likely to report challenges interacting with medical providers, or to avoid needed medical care. Methods: Data for this exploratory, cross-sectional analysis were from older adults (N = 493) ages 60-82 participating in the "LitCog" cohort study. Multivariable generalized linear models compared cognitive impairment (none, mild, moderate, severe) with validated measures of healthcare engagement. Results: A moderate cognitive impairment was associated with delays in medical care due to embarrassment (RR 5.34.95% CI 1.30-22.0) and discomfort asking the doctor questions (RR 4.07, 95% CI 1.00-16.5). Conclusions: Intermediate cognitive deficits, such as with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementias, may impact meaningful engagement with healthcare systems, potentially affecting timely detection and appropriate management of cognitive concerns and other chronic medical conditions. More research is needed to understand mechanisms underlying this relationship.

Association between medication regimen complexity and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and comorbid conditions require patients to take complex medication regimens. Greater regimen complexity has been associated with poorer T2DM management; however, the relationship between overall regimen complexity and glycemic control is unclear. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were: (1) to examine associations between regimen complexity (with the Medication Regimen Complexity Index [MRCI]) and glycemic control (A1C), and (2) to compare overall MRCI with other measures of regimen complexity (overall and diabetes-specific medication count) and diabetes-specific MRCI. METHODS: This was a secondary data analysis of cross-sectional data from a parent trial. Participants were patients with T2DM taking at least 3 chronic medications followed in safety net clinics in the Chicago area. The MRCI measures complexity based on dosing frequency, route of administration, and special instructions for prescribed medications. MRCI scores were created for overall regimens and diabetes-specific medications. Sociodemographics and outpatient visit utilization were included in models as covariates. Linear regression was used to examine the associations between variables of interest and hemoglobin A1C. RESULTS: Participants (N = 432) had a mean age of 56.9 years, most were female (66.0%), and Hispanic or Latino (73.3%). Regimen complexity was high based on overall medications (mean = 6.6 medications, SD: 3.09) and MRCI (mean = 21.4, SD: 11.3). Higher diabetes-specific MRCI was associated with higher A1C in bivariate and multivariable models. In multivariable models, overall MRCI greater than 14, fewer outpatient health care visits, male gender, and absence of health insurance were independently associated with higher A1C. The variance in A1C explained by MRCI was higher compared to medication count for overall and diabetes-specific regimen complexity. CONCLUSIONS: More complex regimens are associated with worse A1C and measuring complexity with MRCI may have advantages. Deprescribing, increasing insurance coverage, and promoting engagement in health care may improve A1C among underserved populations with complex regimens.

Trajectories of Sleep Disturbance and Self-Management of Chronic Conditions during COVID-19 among Middle-aged and Older Adults.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a widespread impact on sleep quality, yet little is known about the prevalence of sleep disturbance and its impact on self-management of chronic conditions during the ongoing pandemic. Objective: To evaluate trajectories of sleep disturbance, and their associations with one's capacity to self-manage chronic conditions. Design: A longitudinal cohort study linked to 3 active clinical trials and 2 cohort studies with 5 time points of sleep data collection (July 15, 2020 - May 23, 2022). Participants: Adults living with chronic conditions who completed sleep questionnaires for two or more time points. Exposure: Trajectories of self-reported sleep disturbance across 5 time points. Main Outcomes: 3 self-reported measures of self-management capacity, including subjective cognitive decline, medication adherence, and self-efficacy for managing chronic disease. Results: 549 adults aged 23 to 91 years were included in the analysis. Two thirds had 3 or more chronic conditions; 42.4% of participants followed a trajectory of moderate or high likelihood of persistent sleep disturbance across the study period. Moderate or high likelihood of sleep disturbance was associated with older age (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.09, 2.26, P<.05), persistent stress (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16, 2.06, P=.003), poorer physical function (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.17, 2.13, P=.003), greater anxiety (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.04, 1.87, P=.03) and depression (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.20, 2.22, P=.002). Moderate or high likelihood of sleep disturbance was also independently associated with subjective cognitive decline, poorer medication adherence, and worse self-efficacy for managing chronic diseases (all P<.001). Conclusions: Persistent sleep disturbance during the pandemic may be an important risk factor for inadequate chronic disease self-management and potentially poor health outcomes in adults living with chronic conditions. Public health and health system strategies might consider monitoring sleep quality in adults with chronic conditions to optimize health outcomes.

Caregiver health literacy and health task performance: Findings from the LitCog caregiver cohort study.

Objective: Many older adults receive assistance in managing their chronic conditions. Yet complicating the utility of caregiver support is whether caregivers have sufficient skills to aid in older adults' health management at home. We examined associations between caregiver health literacy and performance on health tasks. Methods: Caregivers to older adults enrolled in a cognitive aging cohort were recruited to participate in a supplemental interview (n = 97). Caregivers completed one structured interview that included assessments of health literacy and health task performance. Results: Caregivers demonstrated a range of health literacy skills (44% adequate, 36% marginal, 20% low health literacy). In adjusted analyses, caregivers with marginal and low health literacy demonstrated worse overall performance on the health tasks, and poorer interpretation of health information presented on print documents and recall of spoken communication (p's < 0.05). Conclusion: Caregivers with marginal or low health literacy demonstrated poorer performance on everyday health tasks that they commonly assist older adults with. The application of health literacy best-practices to support better training and capacity-building for caregivers is warranted. Innovation: Few studies have considered the health literacy skills of caregivers and its application to caregivers' abilities to carry out common supportive tasks.

Prevalence and risk factors of sleep disturbance in adults with underlying health conditions during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

To determine the prevalence of sleep disturbance during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic among US adults who are more vulnerable to complications because of age and co-morbid conditions, and to identify associated sociodemographic and psychosocial factors. Cross-sectional survey linked to 3 active clinical trials and 2 cohort studies, conducted between 11/30/2020 and 3/3/2021. Five academic internal medicine practices and 2 federally qualified health centers. A total of 715 adults ages 23 to 91 years living with one or more chronic conditions. A fifth (20%) of participants reported poor sleep. Black adults were twice as likely to report poor sleep compared to Whites. Self-reported poor physical function (51%), stress (42%), depression (28%), and anxiety (36%) were also common and all significantly associated with poor sleep. Age ≥70 years and having been vaccinated for COVID-19 were protective against poor sleep. Sex, education, income, alcohol use, and employment status were not significantly associated with sleep quality. In this diverse sample of adults with chronic conditions, by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, disparities in sleep health amid the ongoing pandemic were apparent. Worse physical function and mental health were associated with poor sleep and should be considered targets for health system interventions to prevent the many subsequent consequences of disturbed sleep on health outcomes. Measurements: self-reported sleep quality, physical function, stress, depression, and anxiety.

The Roles of Busyness and Daily Routine in Medication Management Behaviors Among Older Adults.

Busyness (the density of activities) and daily routine (patterns of organizing time) are two understudied factors that likely impact medication-taking behaviors. We examined the association between busyness and routine with medication adherence (MA) in 405 older adults with adequate cognition using multivariable models. The final model included an interaction term between daily routine and busyness. MA scores (measured by the ASK-12, higher scores mean more barriers to adherence) were higher for individuals reporting low and moderate levels of daily routine versus those with high daily routine. MA scores were higher for individuals reporting moderate and high busyness versus those reporting low busyness. The busyness/routine interaction term was significant for MA; among highly busy individuals, those with high daily routine had lower MA scores than those with low routine. A daily routine may be a modifiable factor for improving MA among older adults, particularly among those with busy lives.

Aspects of cognition that impact aging-in-place and long-term care planning.

BACKGROUND: Older adults frequently defer decisions about their aging-in-place/long-term care (AIP-LTC) needs. As a result, when older adults experience worsening Alzheimer's disease, family members/friends become surrogate decision makers. We sought to understand what aspects of cognition impact older adult AIP-LTC planning. METHODS: As part of the PlanYourLifespan (PYL)-LitCog study, we longitudinally examined AIP-LTC decision-making among a cohort (LitCog) of community-based older adults (65 years and older) recruited from hospital-associated primary care clinics in Chicago, Illinois, with extensive cognitive testing. PlanYourLifespan.org (PYL) is an evidence-based online intervention that facilitates AIP-LTC planning. Subjects underwent baseline testing, received the PYL online intervention, and then were surveyed at 1, 6, and 12 months about AIP-LTC decision-making. Cross-sectional logistic regression analysis was conducted examining cognitive variables that impacted AIP-LTC decision-making. RESULTS: Of the 293 older adults interviewed (mean age 73.0 years, 40.4% non-White), subjects were more likely to have made AIP-LTC decisions if they had adequate inductive reasoning (ETS letter sets total-OR = 1.14 (95% CI = 1.03-1.27; p < 0.05)) and adequate working memory (size judgment span total-OR = 1.76 (95% CI = 1.13-2.73; p < 0.05)). There were no differences in decision-making observed in verbal abilities, long-term memory, or processing speed. All analyses were adjusted for participant gender, race, age, and decision-making response at baseline. CONCLUSION: Inductive reasoning and working memory are critical to AIP-LTC decision-making. Screening routinely for these specific cognitive domains is important in targeting and helping older adults prepare in time for their future AIP-LTC needs.

Trajectories of perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 over a year: The COVID-19 & chronic conditions (C3) cohort study.

ABSTRACT: The U.S. public health response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been widely criticized as having downplayed the potential implications COVID-19 could have on one's personal health. Despite the unprecedented threat of COVID-19, many individuals still believed that it was not at all likely that they would become infected. We sought to investigate trends in adults' perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 over the first year of the pandemic, whether distinct trajectories emerged, and if these trajectories differed by participant socio-demographic characteristics.This was a longitudinal cohort study with 5 time points of data collection (March 13, 2020-March 3, 2021). Subjects included 627 adults living with ≥1 chronic conditions, who completed a baseline interview and at least one follow-up interview. In addition to collecting relevant socio-demographic characteristics, participants' perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 across time was assessed and classified into distinct trajectories.Nearly two-thirds (62.2%) of participants perceived themselves to be highly susceptible to COVID-19 from the onset of the pandemic ("early responders") and sustained this over a year, a third (29.0%) eventually perceived themselves to be highly susceptible ("late responders"), and 8.8% maintained a low likelihood of susceptibility throughout the pandemic ("non-responders"). In multivariable analyses, compared to White participants, Latinx participants were significantly more likely to be non-responders and report low likelihood of perceived susceptibility (Risk Ratio [RR]: 3.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.19, 10.1), as were Black participants (RR: 5.49; 95% confidence interval: 2.19, 13.8).A year into the COVID-19 pandemic, 1 out of 11 participants persistently did not think they might be susceptible and potentially infected. Future studies are needed to understand reasons why certain individuals, particularly those of racial/ethnic minorities, did not perceive themselves at risk for infection.

Prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms and impact on self-management among adults with chronic conditions in Chicago, Illinois, USA, during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of mental health symptoms during the first surge of COVID-19 in the USA, and their associations with COVID-19-related emotional distress, health self-management and healthcare utilisation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of wave 3 (1-22 May 2020) survey data from the ongoing Chicago COVID-19 Comorbidities (C3) study. SETTING: Seven academic and community health centres in Chicago, Illinois. PARTICIPANTS: 565 adults aged 23-88 with one or more chronic conditions completing at least one prior C3 study wave. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinically relevant anxiety and depressive symptoms as measured using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System short forms. Self-reported emotional and health-related responses to COVID-19 were measured through a combination of single-item questions and validated measures. RESULTS: Rates of anxiety and depressive symptoms were 14% (81/563) and 15% (84/563), respectively. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were then each separately associated with greater worry about contracting COVID-19 (relative risk (RR) 2.32, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.53; RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.54), greater stress (RR 4.93, 95% CI 3.20 to 7.59; RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.96 to 4.61) and loneliness (RR 3.82, 95% CI 2.21 to 6.60; RR 5.37, 95% CI 3.21 to 8.98), greater avoidance of the doctor (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.49; RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.36) and difficulty managing health (least square means (LS Means) 6.09, 95% CI 5.25 to 6.92 vs 4.23, 95% CI 3.70 to 4.75; LS Means 5.85, 95% CI 5.04 to 6.65 vs 4.22, 95% CI 3.70 to 4.75) and medications (LS Means 3.71, 95% CI 2.98 to 4.43 vs 2.47, 95% CI 2.02 to 2.92) due to the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying and addressing mental health concerns may be an important factor to consider in COVID-19 prevention and management among high-risk medical populations.

Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine trust and hesitancy among adults with chronic conditions.

In a survey of older adults at higher risk for COVID-19 complications, we sought to describe expectations of trust in the safety and efficacy of a future COVID-19 vaccine, and level of hesitancy about receiving it. We also assessed whether these expectations were associated with known or suspected contributors to vaccine hesitancy, disparities in vaccine receipt, and potential targets for public health outreach. From May 1-22, 2020, we performed telephone surveys of 601 older adults with chronic conditions in metro Chicago about their COVID-19 experiences and levels of vaccine trust and hesitancy. All participants previously completed assessments of demographics, health status, health literacy and activation. Bivariate associations were performed using t-tests or one-way ANOVA, and multivariate analyses using least square means. Younger age (<60), Black race, greater complacency about contracting COVID-19, and lower confidence in state or local government were associated with significantly lower trust in a vaccine's safety and efficacy. Black race and greater complacency about contracting COVID-19 were associated with a significantly greater vaccine hesitancy. Amongst Black participants, vaccine hesitancy varied significantly by confidence in the federal government. Trust and hesitancy regarding a future COVID-19 vaccine were associated with age, race, complacency regarding contracting COVID-19, and confidence in government response to the pandemic, but not education, health literacy or activation. Therefore, efforts to vaccinate higher risk older adults must aim not only to educate and provide vaccine access, but engender trust in the vaccine development process and vaccination strategies at both the federal and the local level.

Perceived Adequacy of Tangible Support during Stay-at-Home Orders in Chicago and New York.

OBJECTIVES: Physical distancing precautions during the COVID-19 pandemic may challenge the provision of tangible support many middle age and older adults receive in managing their health. We examined the association between unmet tangible support needs and self-management behaviors and mental health status during the stay-at-home orders in Chicago and New York. METHODS: We used data from the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions study collected between May 1st and May 22nd, 2020. A total of 801 middle age and older adults with ≥1 chronic condition in Chicago and New York City completed the telephone interview. Adequacy of tangible social support was measured using a brief, validated scale that determined whether an individual needed assistance managing his or her health, and if yes, whether this need was met. Participants reported their level of difficulty engaging in self-management behaviors using 2 discrete items; they also self-reported medication adherence using the ASK-12 medication adherence scale. Mental health status was measured using the depression and anxiety PROMIS short-form instruments. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 63 years; 30% identified as Black, 26% identified as Latino, and 12% identified unmet support needs. Inadequacy of tangible support was associated with greater difficulty managing one's health and accessing medications due to COVID-19, as well as poorer medication adherence, increased anxiety and depressive symptoms, and poorer overall well-being (P's < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Perceived unmet support needs during stay-at-home orders were associated with greater difficulty engaging in self-management behaviors and poorer overall well-being. Two brief items quickly identified individuals with unmet support needs.